7 years ago
16 April, 2018
One recent research project we have co-funded investigated whether UV filters (used in many sunscreens) were present in human breast tissue.
We asked Professor Philippa Darbre, who led the research, to explain why this research is so important.
PD – UV stands for ‘Ultraviolet’ – and UV filters are chemicals used as protection against harmful damage caused by UV light. There are around 50 different types of chemical UV filters. As you’d expect, they’re used widely in sunscreen creams to protect skin from damage by UV light, which can lead to skin cancer. But they may also be added to other personal care products. Such as moisturisers to increase product stability or incorporated into textiles, marketed as UV-protective clothing. For those interested in the long chemical names for these things, the most commonly used UV filters include benzophenones (e.g. benzophenone-3 or BP-3), octylmethoxycinnamate (OMC), 4-methylbenzilidenecamphor (4-MBC), homosalate (HS) and octocrylene (OCT).
PD – Unfortunately not, these chemicals do not break down easily or disappear quickly once washed off. In fact, due to their widespread use in consumer products – notably sunscreens – they are increasingly found in the environment. For example, in water, soil and tissues of aquatic organisms (1).
Also, studies have shown that the skin rapidly absorbs these chemicals and can be measured at increased levels in blood just one hour after applying them to the skin (2). These and other UV filters have been identified in various human body fluids and tissues, including urine, placenta, breast milk and, most recently, human breast tissue (3). So they’re not easily removed from the body either.
PD – The problem is that UV filters are known to be endocrine disrupting chemicals or EDCs, which can mimic natural oestrogen found in our bodies. Lifetime exposure to oestrogen is an established risk factor for breast cancer.
The UV filters, BP-3, OMC, 4-MBC, HS and OCT, are known EDCs and all possess oestrogenic properties. In separate studies, they have been shown to increase the growth of oestrogen-responsive human breast cancer cells when cultured under laboratory conditions (4, 5).
Furthermore, at levels we recently detected in human breast tissue, BP-3, OMC, and 4-MBC can increase proliferation, migration and invasive properties of human breast cancer cells grown in cell culture (6, 7). This implies a potential for these UV filters to increase tumour spread. This is especially relevant for breast cancer, where tumour spread is the main cause of mortality.
PD – Our recent work investigated whether four commonly used UV filters were present in breast tissue from 40 women who’d undergone mastectomies due to breast cancer diagnosis. We took measurements in 3 different locations across the breast to see if they were more heavily distributed at specific sites where breast cancer is most common. We found one or more UV filters were measurable in 84% of tissue samples—at least one breast region for 95% of the women. Specifically, BP-3 was measured in 69% of the tissue samples, and OMC was measured in 74%. 4-MBC was detected less often – in only 13% of samples. We did not detect HS in any of the tissue samples. These UV filters have been shown to be oestrogenic, and their presence in human breast tissue suggests their potential to influence breast cancer development.
PD – People should avoid excessive skin exposure to UV rays from sunlight or elsewhere. But there are ways of doing this other than just covering our bodies with these chemicals. It’s best to avoid the sun when it’s hottest, cover up using a hat and cool long sleeves etc. However, if you cannot cover up, you could consider using an old-fashioned zinc oxide-based sunscreen, which many organic cosmetics companies market.
It would seem unlikely that occasional holiday use of chemical UV filters in sunscreen would cause serious harm because studies of applying to skin show not only that the chemicals are absorbed within 1 hour but also that they are largely cleared after 24 hours. However, more and more products that are not primarily sunscreens now contain UV filters – to protect the product rather than the user. This means that we may all be exposed to these chemicals every day without realising it. The oestrogenic activity of UV filters and their identification in breast tissue suggests they may have the potential to influence breast cancer development, so their regular use –from the application of a personal care product such as moisturiser or wearing impregnated clothing – should be avoided.
To read Professor Darbre’s recently published article on UV filters in breast tissue, visit here, and to read more about her Breast Cancer UK awarded grant, visit here.
9 June 2025
Ready to spice up your dinner routine? Say hello to our Spiced Aubergine Bake. Blending warming spices with rich tomato sauce and golden roasted aubergine, this recipe is easy to...
Read full story2 June 2025
Whip up a quick and delicious Courgette and Cheese Frittata with this easy recipe! Perfect for brunch, lunch or a light dinner – packed with flavour and ready in 30...
Read full story23 May 2025
Have you ever thought about what’s really in your new body cream? Could its ingredients be doing more harm than good? For this year’s Prevention Week, we’re advocating for...
Read full story22 May 2025
Exposing the hidden dangers in our daily beauty routines may seem scary, but at Breast Cancer UK, we believe that honesty and education are vital to creating healthier, happier habits. ...
Read full storyA £10 donation today can help fund our PHD studentships to carry out world-class animal free research into the causes of breast cancer.
New easy way for you to donate to Breast Cancer UK:
Donate £5 please text BCUK001 to 70970